Find where a case summary departs from the English original
Does the Korean summary of a case (situation, options, meaning of the choice) change or drop anything the English original says?
For review · preparing to recruit
This task is published for review; external recruitment has not started. Submissions are accepted, stay pending, and are answered by a human reviewer.
What to work from
The English original under each case's "Original text and sources", and the summary, option table, and meaning of the choice on the same page.
- An adult who refuses protective custody — a decision due within two hours →med-protective-custody
- Pre-screening on a research network versus its safeguards — choosing one two-year charter →tec-research-network-prescreening
- The committee's approved theory or one's own — choosing the brief for an 18-month appeal →law-committee-brief
Format example — not an actual finding
Case: med-protective-custody Summary sentence: "...restricts the person's choice of daily schedule, movement and activities for six months." Original passage: "...for six months until the board's mandatory review restores personal choice..." Difference: (state in 1–3 sentences how the summary differs from the original — or that it does not.)
What counts as complete
One case, the summary sentence and the original passage quoted side by side, and 1–3 sentences on the difference. "No difference", with the passages quoted, also counts.
Evidence: optional · no need to fit the 19 values · no need to agree with the vision
Who sees what
The submission text, the public name, and the review outcome (reflected or not, and why) may be published on the case page once review is complete. Contact details are never published. Nothing is published before review.
Submit from the web
Loading…