Point out where the design-time value code fails to capture an option's gains and losses
What in the gains and losses written into the options does the case's design-time value code (e.g. Sda/Sep, Sdt/Ses, Sdt/Fac) fail to capture? You do not need to propose a replacement from the 19 values.
For review · preparing to recruit
This task is published for review; external recruitment has not started. Submissions are accepted, stay pending, and are answered by a human reviewer.
What to work from
The case's option table, meaning of the choice and value-code note, and the judgment vocabulary (AIO Commons "Language" page).
- An adult who refuses protective custody — a decision due within two hours →med-protective-custody
- Pre-screening on a research network versus its safeguards — choosing one two-year charter →tec-research-network-prescreening
- The committee's approved theory or one's own — choosing the brief for an 18-month appeal →law-committee-brief
Format example — not an actual finding
Case: law-committee-brief Code as designed: Sdt/Fac What it misses: (a gain or loss written into the options that the code does not show) Evidence: (a passage of the original option, or a vocabulary definition)
What counts as complete
One case, the code as designed, what it misses, and at least one piece of evidence. Proposing a replacement code is optional.
Evidence: at least one required · no need to fit the 19 values · no need to agree with the vision
Who sees what
The submission text, the public name, and the review outcome (reflected or not, and why) may be published on the case page once review is complete. Contact details are never published. Nothing is published before review.
Submit from the web
Loading…